Communiquez avec les autres et partagez vos connaissances professionnelles

Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.

Suivre

Do you use SPH (Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics) or grid-based methods for most of your CFD simulations?

Which method do you prefer? What software do you use? and why?

user-image
Question ajoutée par Husam Al-Kuran , Teaching Assistant , The American University of the Middle East
Date de publication: 2013/12/23
mehran hashemian
par mehran hashemian , researcher , urmia university

I prefer grid-based methods

ABDELHAKIM AISSAOUI
par ABDELHAKIM AISSAOUI , technical Director UK-India , EXA corporation

in order to deliver realistic projects and complex models we use PowerFLOW EXA software which is Lattice Boltzmann application based on Particles discretization.

the software use the LBM and allow accurate results independently from the user and mesh. the software is used by all the automotive companies due its speed ,  accuracy and repeatability

for more information please let me know and I will be able to guide you towards the best usage in CFD especially in universities cases and real projects 

Rony Das
par Rony Das , Assistant Manager- Maintenance , BSRM Steels Ltd

yes, I have used grid based method and I have used gambit.

Shahid  Nadeem
par Shahid Nadeem , Engineer , FLOWPAK, QATAR

Whats the meaning of SPH n why it is used

More Questions Like This

Avez-vous besoin d'aide pour créer un CV ayant les mots-clés recherchés par les employeurs?