Communiquez avec les autres et partagez vos connaissances professionnelles

Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.

Suivre

What is the difference between conventional and addressable fire detection system?

user-image
Question ajoutée par MOHAMED YASIN , IT / ELV Systems Engineer , Free Zone Company
Date de publication: 2017/01/09
Abdul Rauf Soomro
par Abdul Rauf Soomro , Senior Sale Consultant , Tarkeez Electromechanical Contracting

Every device connected to the addressable system has its own unique address. When a fire is detected, the device’s address shows up on the main control panel, telling you exactly which device has been activated. This will enable you to find the exact location of a fire and extinguish them quickly. With a conventional system, there is no way of pinpointing the exact location of the fire. However, by wiring your building into different zones, you can get a general idea of where the fire is. For instance, if you have two floors, you could wire the first as ‘zone 1’ and the second as zone 2. So if a fire occurs in zone 1, you know that the fire is somewhere on the first floor.

Vladimir Knežević
par Vladimir Knežević , Specialist Operator , Lego Czech

If it is a stationary you need to have a man who is capable to know what to do when alarm is on and to be in that place or room like for security gurads. In addressable mode you could put alarm on cell phone so that people who are responsible, they could be on any place and they will have info on cell phone or computer inside their room. Regards from me.

Mohamed Emad
par Mohamed Emad , MEP manager , Samcrete

Dear Mohamed,

Conventional tells you only that there's an alarm in the zone,

Addressable tells you exactly what and where the alarm is with an address.

 

mark joseph yango
par mark joseph yango , fire alarm technician , almana real state

The main difference between  the two is that with addressable fire systems, you can pinpoint exactly which device has been activated. While in conventional you will only now which floor or which area is in alarm 

Aldrin Barase
par Aldrin Barase , Telecom Operation Engineer , Qatar Petroleum

The precision reporting of the alarm location is the big difference on both fire 

detection system.

Md Kamruzzaman
par Md Kamruzzaman , Manager(Sales & Engineering) , : Thermotech Green Product Ltd & Saf International

In addressable alarm system each detector is assigned a specific ID or address therefore in case of fire detection the address of the detector activated is displayed on the panel whereas in Conventional system the zone of the activated detector is displayed on the fire control panel.

Brajendra Kumar
par Brajendra Kumar , Commissioning Engineer ELV Systems , Ceasefire Industries Limited

Conventional System is Zone wise Alarm Showing on Panel, And Addressable System is Loop, Zone, and Particular device wise Alarm Showing on Panel,

jobin sam
par jobin sam , Maintenance Engineer , NAFFCO

In addressable system each device is assigned a specific ID and always panel communicate with device .

In conventional system devices are grouped as zones.

in conventional you can not specify the exact sensor (fire place) as it is specify the zone , in addressable you can specify the exact fire place as it is specify the sonsor . the conventianal system is less expensive than addressable and less accurate

Muhammad  Rashid
par Muhammad Rashid , Assistant Manager Operations , The Mall

conventional system rectification or troubleshooting is difficult

in addressable system trouble shooting is easy.

More Questions Like This

Avez-vous besoin d'aide pour créer un CV ayant les mots-clés recherchés par les employeurs?