Communiquez avec les autres et partagez vos connaissances professionnelles

Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.

Suivre

Is 4 valves per cylinder more efficient than 2 valves per cylinder? Why?

user-image
Question ajoutée par Alex Al Yazouri , General Manager , Al Mushref Cooperative Society
Date de publication: 2015/04/11
Wolf Klaas Kinsbergen
par Wolf Klaas Kinsbergen , Managing Director, Designer , ingenieursbureau KB International NV

4 valves is more efficient, it gets the mixture quicker in and the exhaust fumes quicker out of the cylinder.

 

 

faisal almajnoni
par faisal almajnoni , مهندس ميكانيكي , شركة موبكو

because its stability and give high power 

Vinod Jetley
par Vinod Jetley , Assistant General Manager , State Bank of India

In automotive engineering a multi-valve or multivalve engine is one where each cylinder has more than two valves. A multi-valve engine has better breathing and may be able to operate at higher revolutions per minute (RPM) than a two-valve engine, delivering more power

Most engines have2 valves per cylinder,1 for exhaust and1 for intake of air and fuel. Todays more modern and more efficient engines utilize4 valves per cylinder to get maximum power and fuel economy. Again,2 intake and2 exhaust valves per cylinder. 

good luck....

Shiva Kant Tiwari
par Shiva Kant Tiwari , Auto-Mobile Engineer , Madhvani Group

Valves just increases the efficiency of combustion and shorten the lead time,but valves are also depends upon the types of piston ,type of engine like high speed or for heavy load condition etc. various other reason are also there for using4 valves 

Sarfraz Shaukat
par Sarfraz Shaukat , Vehicle Technician and MOT Tester , Startin Group

A multi-valve engine has better breathing and may be able to operate at higher  (RPM) than a two-valve engine, delivering more power.

FOUR VALVES IN A CYLINDER BETTER THAN TWO BECAUSE IT IMPROVES THE VOLUMETRIC EFFICIENCY AND AIDS IN SCARVENGING THE BURN''T GASES OUT OF THE CYLINDER .

 

 

Alex Al Yazouri
par Alex Al Yazouri , General Manager , Al Mushref Cooperative Society

4 valve vs2 valve. The name of the game is velocity and turbulence/mixing of the intake charge at differing engine speeds. At low engine speeds, one intake valve gives increased velocity, hence better gas mixing and better cylinder filling. If you open a second intake valve at low engine speed, the velocity drops dramitically, leaving poor intake filling and a lean intake charge. The result is engine knock and less torque.

On the other hand, at high RPM, breathing is the name of the game. The valves are open such a short length of time you need the maximum available intake area. Therefore2 intake valves work better at high RPM. All of this is of course subject to the exhaust system design.

A proper extractor exhaust can make a significant difference on a two valve system and a restrictive exhaust can nullify all the gains of a4 valve system. These are SYSTEM designs we are talking about, both intake and exhaust are related. Change one parameter and you must change the rest of the system or you have wasted your time. To wit, most guys who add street superchargers don't see much need to have4 valve heads because the supercharger is packing the cylinders as full as they can get at streetable RPM.

The real world test is to compare the RPM vs Horsepower (or torque)charts that come from dyno testing. Look at similar engine displacements with2 valve and4 valve heads. Then look at the curves for two entirely different engines with the same horsepower ratings.

For example, compare a turbo,4 valve,2 liter racing engine (500 Hp @10,000 RPM) to a naturally aspirated2 valve427 cubic inch street engine (500 Hp @5000 RPM). Now you see the complexity of comparisons! There are no universal answers, just better or worse application.

More Questions Like This

Avez-vous besoin d'aide pour créer un CV ayant les mots-clés recherchés par les employeurs?