Register now or log in to join your professional community.
I always believe in diplomacy that all conflicts can be resolved in a calm and professional manner. First thing first is to identify the cause of conflict and compromise to come up with better solution.
That really depends on how important that vendor is to you. If important, you have to find mutually beneficial solution and dance about it with much diplomacy, no matter what your contract allows you to do. If easily replaceable, you can go ahead and crush them to the full extent of possibility given to you by virtue of well written contract.
However, as world has become really small these days, you would be smart to be merciful and not run the supplier to the ground - you never know what future brings and where you might meet them next.
In all cases you want to handle it in line with your company's values and corporate culture, otherwise you might hurt the reputation (and ultimately brand value) of your company.
I believe your supplier contract should be the first point of call where supplier performance expectations are clearly spelt out. If not then this becomes a potentially conflict source on both partners. However, your resolution should underpin the values of your company. You would not want to step on the toes of your critical or strategic supplier, so rate your supplier first before raffling any feathers. A win win situation is ultimately desirable where huge financial commitments are involved.If the supplier is not strategic and competitors are ready to jump in, then put your foot down and whip him into line for good supplier performance.
By sitting with the supplier and discussing the points of differences and disagreements. If differences/diagreents still exist then may be you both should go to the contract and see if there is a way out. if differences are still there try to agree on an arbitrator to help in getting to an agreement.
I think
This will depend on the nature of the disagreement. The agreement drafted upfront for the supply of goods or provisions of services need of be detailed and explicit. An MOU or contract should define price and service levels.
The disagreement may come at the point of inbound receipt of goods. The process should clearly define actions required when an anomaly occurs including the capture of photographic evidence in support of any claims.
A good supplier will always asume fault unless evidence supports otherwise.
The tone of engagement greatly depends on how strategic the supplier is. if it is routine and little financial commitment , you may do away with the supplier and move on. For big contracts and strategic suppliers, a procurement professional needs to understand the concept of contracts and understanding the terms carefully. in the event of disagreements, your first stop is your contract and a good contract would have remedies for breach. Also, diplomacy and clear mindedness is essential.
Through Dialogues, no matter how big or small your vendor is.
You need to point out what you both agree on to minimize the tension part of the discussion and lower differences between both of you. You need to find a place where you both meet so when you negotiate you need to put a range where you can go down to and not stick to one point which will reach to a conflict with the supplier
you need to come up with a win win agreement.
Do you need help in adding the right keywords to your CV? Let our CV writing experts help you.