Register now or log in to join your professional community.
- Juniper CLI is much better/clear for learning, even for entry level devices (part of features implemented at ASR devices). Such features like compare configuration, commit confirmed, config revisions, configuration divided by blocks - good point to start. It looks like Juniper engineers looked at Cisco and decided to complete all administrators requests (when Cisco prefer classical level approach).
- Similar CLI for all ent. devices (EX, J, SRX)
- HA clustering as i remember for all Junos devices (used mostly for SRX in my company). License not necessary, working like a charm.
- Firewall SRX with full routing capabilities working MUCH more scalable then ASA series
- less licensing price overhead. Price for its devices..
from cons:
- GUI is slow and ugly. You have to manage all policies from CLI, for IPS/IDS/UTM - that is not so good option.
- harder to debug (compared to Cisco) but more granular.
- with all features enable (UTM, IDP, IPS, etc) commit configuration can take several minutes...
Do you need help in adding the right keywords to your CV? Let our CV writing experts help you.