Start networking and exchanging professional insights

Register now or log in to join your professional community.

Follow

What is the difference between 'ought to' and' had to'? Give examples please.

user-image
Question added by hanen Deb
Date Posted: 2016/03/19
Mohammad Magdy Eid
by Mohammad Magdy Eid , رئيس فريق بقسم اللغة العربية , المتحدة جروب لتكنولوجيا المعلومات والبرمجيات

thanks for the invitation

 

I agree with specialties answers. Thanks. 

مها شرف
by مها شرف , معلمة لغة عربية , وزارة التربية السورية

I agree with specialties answers. Thanks. 

Yahia mohamed  Amen Gad
by Yahia mohamed Amen Gad , إدارة - مدرب - , سنابل الأجيال للتعليم والتدريب

Ought to” used to indicate obligation or duty, advisability and desiarability. “had to” is compulsory and more stronger than “ought to”.

to is used for obligations. Had to is the past tense of have to

Shahul  Hameed Mohammad
by Shahul Hameed Mohammad , Human Resources Generalist (HR Generalist) , S A CO

Ought to” used to indicate obligation or duty, advisability and desiarability. “had to” is compulsory and more stronger than “ought to”.

Example

You ought to work harder than that

 

When you must do something, you had to do it. It is used for a situation that has no choice.Have to is used for obligations. Had to is the past tense of have to 

Ought to means Example sentence is " you ought to know by know how much you mean to me" It should be known by it Had to means Example sentence" you had to know everthing About it It means - it must be know

Apologized for the answer, I leave the answer to the specialists.

More Questions Like This

Do you need help in adding the right keywords to your CV? Let our CV writing experts help you.