Two institutions are popularly referred to as the “Bretton Woods Twin” is Monetary Fund and World Bank, Comment their role on Country’s Developments?

The IMF was set up along with the World Bank after the 2nd World War to assist in the reconstruction of war-ravaged countries. The both organisations were agreed to be set up at a conference in Bretton Woods in the US. Hence, they are known as the Bretton Woods twins.

Leaders felt that financial stability was best achieved when countries worked in an environment of interdependence. IMF was supposed to oversee and monitor the economic performance of member countries and warn them of any developing economic crisis. WB Works to provide soft loans for the development of social and economic infrastructure to countries. It also has a set of conditions that it often follow and broadly follows the IMF prescription.

Now the point is how effective the twins activity for a country its totally depends on the country management and administration. IF there is no political drama and interest it works and that's why the twins are still effective and influential.

The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank were both created at an international conference convened in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, United States in July 1944. The goal of the conference was to establish a framework for economic cooperation and development that would lead to a more stable and prosperous global economy. While this goal remains central to both institutions, their work is constantly evolving in response to new economic developments and challenges.

The IMF’s mandate. The IMF promotes international monetary cooperation and provides policy advice and technical assistance to help countries build and maintain strong economies. The IMF also makes loans and helps countries design policy programs to solve balance of payments problems when sufficient financing on affordable terms cannot be obtained to meet net international payments. IMF loans are short and medium term and funded mainly by the pool of quota contributions that its members provide. IMF staff are primarily economists with wide experience in macroeconomic and financial policies.

The World Bank’s mandate. The World Bank promotes long-term economic development and poverty reduction by providing technical and financial support to help countries reform particular sectors or implement specific projects—such as, building schools and health centers, providing water and electricity, fighting disease, and protecting the environment. World Bank assistance is generally long term and is funded both by member country contributions and through bond issuance. World Bank staff are often specialists in particular issues, sectors, or techniques.

Framework for cooperation

The IMF and World Bank collaborate regularly and at many levels to assist member countries and work together on several initiatives. In 1989, the terms for their cooperation were set out in a concordat to ensure effective collaboration in areas of shared responsibility.

High-level coordination. During the Annual Meetings of the Boards of Governors of the IMF and the World Bank, Governors consult and present their countries’ views on current issues in international economics and finance. The Boards of Governors decide how to address international economic and financial issues and set priorities for the organizations.

A group of IMF and World Bank Governors also meet as part of the Development Committee, whose meetings coincide with the Spring and Annual Meetings of the IMF and the World Bank. This committee was established in 1974 to advise the two institutions on critical development issues and on the financial resources required to promote economic development in low-income countries.

Management consultation. The Managing Director of the IMF and the President of the World Bank meet regularly to consult on major issues. They also issue joint statements and occasionally write joint articles, and have visited several regions and countries together.

Staff collaboration. IMF and Bank staffs collaborate closely on country assistance and policy issues that are relevant for both institutions. The two institutions often conduct country missions in parallel and staff participate in each other’s missions. IMF assessments of a country’s general economic situation and policies provide input to the Bank’s assessments of potential development projects or reforms. Similarly, Bank advice on structural and sectoral reforms is taken into account by the IMF in its policy advice. The staffs of the two institutions also cooperate on the conditionality involved in their respective lending programs.

The 2007 external review of Bank-Fund collaboration led to a Joint Management Action Plan on World Bank-IMF Collaboration (JMAP) to further enhance the way the two institutions work together. Under the plan, Fund and Bank country teams discuss their country-level work programs, which identify macro-critical sectoral issues, the division of labor, and the work needed in the coming year. A review of Bank-Fund Collaboration underscored the importance of these joint country team consultations in enhancing collaboration.

Reducing debt burdens. The IMF and World Bank also work together to reduce the external debt burdens of the most heavily indebted poor countries under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative and the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI). The objective is to help low-income countries achieve their development goals without creating future debt problems. IMF and Bank staff jointly prepare country debt sustainability analyses under the Debt Sustainability Framework (DSF) developed by the two institutions.

Reducing poverty. In 1999, the IMF and the World Bank launched the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) approach as a key component in the process leading to debt relief under the HIPC Initiative and an important anchor in concessional lending by the Fund and the Bank. While PRSPs continue to underpin the HIPC Initiative, the World Bank adopted in July 2014 a new approach to country engagement that no longer requires PRSPs while focusing on the elimination of extreme poverty and promotion of shared prosperity. The Fund continues to rely on the PRSP to provide the link between a Fund-supported program and the poverty reduction and growth objectives of a member country.

Setting the stage for the 2030 development agenda. Since 2004, the Fund and the Bank have jointly published the annual Global Monitoring Report (GMR), which assesses progress towards the 2015 UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The forthcoming GMR (2015/16) will discuss the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that have replaced the MDGs as the basis for the 2030 development agenda. The Fund and the Bank have been active participants in the global debate on the 2030 development agenda. Each institution has committed to new initiatives, within their respective remits, to support member countries in reaching their development goals, and are working together on development initiatives to better assist the joint membership.

Assessing financial stability. The IMF and the World Bank are also working together to make financial sectors in member countries resilient and well regulated. The Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) was introduced in 1999 to identify the strengths and vulnerabilities of a country's financial system and recommend appropriate policy responses.

Please don't send irrelevant questions invitations. Invite people as per expertise. It will save your time as well as others. Time is money. 

Agree with Answer given by mr. Khalid Ghaffar 

Thanks

Totally agree with Mr. khalid's answer

These institutions are good for country's development but you have to be careful with them because if you don't have a good investment plan you risk to take another loan from them and you will be addicted by their money. At a certain point they will stop to give you more until you give back something and before you show some improvements in your country. As a conclusion a pact with these institutions is a necessary evil.

Mr.Khalid Ghaffar has explained well and I am fully agreed with him

Mr.Khalid Ghaffar has nailed it, thank you for the opportunity!

I fully agree with the answers been added by EXPERTS....THanks

Support the answer above...

I guess investing in development of infrastructure, improve the educational institute, and anti-corruption improvement, basically development of a country for better.