Start networking and exchanging professional insights

Register now or log in to join your professional community.

Follow

How is UDLD different than LoopGuard in detecting link failure?

user-image
Question added by Syed Javed , it consultant , Infosys
Date Posted: 2016/02/03
Akbar Maqsood Alam
by Akbar Maqsood Alam , System Admin , Star Services LLC

The loop guard feature is enabled on a per-port basis. However, as long as it blocks the port on the STP level, loop guard blocks inconsistent ports on a per-VLAN basis (because of per-VLAN STP)

Ramiz Atout
by Ramiz Atout , Network admin, social media , Sharjah Media Centre

The loop guard feature is enabled on a per-port basis. However, as long as it blocks the port on the STP level, loop guard blocks inconsistent ports on a per-VLAN basis (because of per-VLAN STP). That is, if BPDUs are not received on the trunk port for only one particular VLAN, only that VLAN is blocked (moved to loop-inconsistent STP state). For the same reason, if enabled on an EtherChannel interface, the entire channel is blocked for a particular VLAN, not just one link (because EtherChannel is regarded as one logical port from the STP point of view).

Laith Ibrahim
by Laith Ibrahim , Presales Consultant , SamaWave Solutions

The UDLD is a protocol to check if the fiber connection is bidirectional or not,

but Loopguard is a safe measure to prevent loops in case of failure in the hardware.

 

Read more about them at cisco website.

 

More Questions Like This

Do you need help in adding the right keywords to your CV? Let our CV writing experts help you.