Is it right for the owner to be general manager of his company?or is it better for recruiting one?

According to my point view , It is better to recruit general manager instead of being

himself.

It will depends on the size of his business

It depends on the size of the company and its resources. Professionally speaking, an owner could be the CEO or chairman of the board but not to wear both hats at least to maintain unbiased decisions.

It's better he appoints a experienced General Manager so he can free his time and concentrate on business expansion.

It's beeter to hire  a qualified and trained person to manage  his or her company .

Hi Thank you for the invitation and thank the rest of your colleagues for the wonderful answers If the owner is proficient in the competence of the tasks of his project, it is best to be the commander-in-chief to understand all the functions of the human system of the institution. If he is not familiar with the tasks and is not competent, the specialists will assume the general command as general manager.

It is better to recruiting one especially for the big companies

BETTER TO RECRUITING A GENERAL .

1-WHATEVER HAPPEN THE OWNER WILL TAKE A PERSONAL DECISION WHILE SOMETIMES AND IN SPECIAL CASE SHOULD TAKE A PROFESSIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC COMPANY.

2-THE OWNER IS A HUMAN BEING AND IS SOMETIMES PREFERRED TO GIVE WORK TO ONE OF HIS RELATIVES.

TAKE IN CONSIDERATION IF THE OWNER HAS COMPETENCE IN THE FIELD OF WORK.

Ofcourse it's right Bt you have to see the firm turnover also

Yes why not But he should act professional

Its right and not right. .right if he ll be a professional in his company. .not right if he isn't. Going to be a responsible