What is the difference between an implicit cost and an explicit cost?

An implicit cost is an indirect cost, which we cannot control (or accrue), while the explicit cost can be followed and controlled. For example, for a car used in transport (as a taxi, let's say), an implicit cost will be the lube consumption or the usage of the parts, while a direct cost will be the fuel consumption.

An implicit cost is a cost that has occurred but it is not initially shown or reported as a separate cost. On the other hand, an explicit cost is one that has occurred and is clearly reported as a separate cost. 

An example of implicit cost is: the cost of permits / custom clearance fees of certain procured materials. The cost of procuring plus the smaller costs, fees, permits are usually implicit within the bidding offer. 

Explicit cost is the clearly-stated cost for a certain service, or number of units price,  within bill of quantities.   

Explicit cost is the cost of Nconha belong to a certain item or cost center itself

The implicit cost is a assigned to spend or pay, among other costs to achieve item

Implicit cost is the indirect cost which we cant control on it as it has no direct link with the production and the   explicit cost is the cost which we can follow it up and control and its linking directly with the production

Rent, salary and other operating expenses are considered explicit costs and are recorded within a company's financial statements. The main difference between the two types of costs is that implicit costs are opportunity costs, while explicit costs are expenses paid with a company's own tangible assets.